April 11th, 2008

New studies highlight dizzying complexity of Hungarian tax system

Taxes in Hungary are not only high, but also unnecessarily complicated and confusing, and this puts Hungarian companies at a severe competitive disadvantage, new studies unveiled at a conference organized by the Economic Competitiveness Roundtable (GVK) concluded.

According to a study compiled by the University of Pécs, the main problem with Hungarian taxes is not that they are high, but that the tax regime is too complex and confusing, which puts businesses into a precarious position both legally and economically.

Small and medium-sized enterprises, for instance, pay 12 different taxes on average, depending on their income level.

The number of taxes grow with the size of staff. While self-employed enterprises have to pay seven, businesses with 10 staff and over are liable to 17 different taxes.

Small businesses also have a hard time keeping track of fast-changing tax regulations. Nearly two-thirds of them prefer to hire an accounting firm to handle their tax affairs and only 12% manage their own.

Another study, prepared by the Budapest Corvinus University of Economics, found tax administration to be another area dogged by encumbrances. While the state should place more emphasis on inspections, administration needs to be slimmed down through the consolidation of budgetary institutions.

University professor László Szerb urged that Hungary take steps to tighten tax rules, raise penalities for tax evasion and change public perception on taxation.

Allowing multinational companies to publish their financial reports according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) only, rather than using both IFRS and a Hungarian accounting standards would help toward cutting red tape.

At the same time, László Zara, head of the National Tax Advisors’ Association (MAKSZOE) stressed that without a firm government commitment, none of these recommendations stand a chance become a reality, even though they technically cost nothing.

Topics
Share
Comments [3]
The All Hungary Media Group is firmly committed to freedom of expression and therefore applies a mostly "hands off" approach to comment moderation. Comments left by readers represent their own views and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the staff, editors or owner of the All Hungary Media Group, who nonetheless reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic or which moderators consider to constitute "hate speech." Also note that in order to prevent spam we generally close entries off to comments several days after publication.
  1. Rolrox says:

    I don’t think Prof Szerb has any experience running a small company. 1) High taxes are a problem as well as the complexity. 2) its easy to run afoul of APEH; mistakes are plentiful and the penalties are already excessive in comparison with the error (for example, not filing a quarterly report where there was 0 income got me the grand penalty of 200,000 HUF).

    By “change the perception” did Prof Szerb mean that the system should be made even worse?

  2. Viking says:

    Rolrox: “By “change the perception” did Prof Szerb mean that the system should be made even worse?”

    No, he probably meant that you should smile when you got the penalty.

  3. grammy says:

    there are two points i wish to make.

    1. did we, the taxpayers, really need to pay to have a university, (let alone two universities) to tell us something that is glaringly obvious to everyone?

    2. Prof Lászlo, seems to have missed the point entirely. Changing perception sounds great, but making taxes simple and the ammount payable less sounds much better.