August 13th, 2008
topics:

Transparency International urges creation of public procurement database

The Hungarian office of anti-corruption NGO Transparency International (TI) has urged the government to create searchable databases of public procurements that describe contracts, show their value, and reveal the parties with whom they were signed.

TI gave Hungary bad marks for failing to put into practice measures introduced as part of the “glass pocket” programme in 2003 and in an act on the accessibility of information approved in 2005.

Central and local government procurements pose the greatest risk for corruption in Hungary. Failing to implement fully transparency measures will undermine the confidence of all Hungarians in the long term, TI warned.

Topics
Share
Comments [4]
The All Hungary Media Group is firmly committed to freedom of expression and therefore applies a mostly "hands off" approach to comment moderation. Comments left by readers represent their own views and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the staff, editors or owner of the All Hungary Media Group, who nonetheless reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic or which moderators consider to constitute "hate speech." Also note that in order to prevent spam we generally close entries off to comments several days after publication.
  1. raging bullshit says:

    dream on!

  2. Viking says:

    Sounds like a good suggestion (from TI). Now it is up to the voters to demand this from the politicians in the next election.

  3. Erk says:

    What really cooks my noodle is that the EU didn’t demand this YEARS ago… when you look at many of these big deals (especially infrastructure) like 3/4 of the money is EU funds. In fact, to the extent public procurement is feeding corruption and bad governance in Hungary, a significant amount of culpability lies with the EU, and those member states that are ponying up the money.

  4. Viking says:

    EU has some different mechanisms to check that their funds are used to what they were supposed to. I do not think that equals to they have any opinion who should be rewarded which contract, just that their money was “reasonable” spent.

    I do not think the TI’s recommendation is praxis in all of the original EU-countries and itself does not stop corruption and bribes. It does though take away some of the hush-hush that feeds a lot conspiracy theories.