If there are two main themes to opinion pieces on this website, they are a) counterproductive attempts at economic development by government or quasi-government entities in Hungary, and b) signs that the whole world, or at least Hungary, is going to hell in a handbasket. Today’s has both. According to various sources we learn that a group of businesspeople and citizens in the Western Hungarian city of Sopron is poised to being circulating their own currency. Called the kékfrank (“blue franc”), the new notes come in a variety of denominations mirroring those of the Hungarian forint – to which it is linked – and feature the likenesses of composer Ferenc Liszt, Joseph Haydn and other historical figures with ties to the area. It is also a multilingual currency, featuring Croatian in addition to Hungarian and German. (Apparently there must be a lot of ethnic Croats out near the border.) While it isn’t yet in circulation, the new currency can already be “pre-ordered” from the initiative’s website (www.kekfrank.hu). Again, this isn’t a joke – at least not one the people behind it seem to be in on.
While details on the kékfrank program are still a little sketchy – aren’t they always with things like this? – the basic idea is that companies that join the initiative commit themselves to accepting the notes as if they are real money before at some point converting them back to forints. The kékfrank notes would be issued in the same denominations as forints – ranging from 500 to 20,000 units – and would be offered “at par,” meaning that a 5,000 kékfrank note like the one pictured above featuring 17th-century Sopron mayor (and “humanist”) Kristóf Lackner would have the same value as the more familiar Ft 5,000 note featuring 19th-century Hungarian statesman István Széchenyi.
Tamás Perkovicz, chairman of the HA-MI Összefogunk Európai Szövetkezet (“When We Unite European Association”), the organization that initiated the program, predicts that the kékfrank could replace as much as 20% of the traditional currency transactions in and around Sopron, meaning billions and billions of forints.
Movements to create parallel forms of currency – or “script,” as it is known in the United States – are nothing new. According to this article, the fathers of the kékfrank seem to have gotten the idea from a similar initiative in Switzerland called WIR, which apparently has been used there during recessions.
But unlike some more limited schemes aimed at encouraging consumers to shop locally – such as the “Pécs Card” we wrote about back in 2008 – the kékfrank seems to be built on rather larger ambitions. Chief among these is the apparent belief by its backers that it can provide an alternative to high-interest loans. Its backers also say that the notes will cut down on the administrative costs of companies that do a lot of business together.
Indeed, the kékfrank in some ways seems to run counter to the traditional “buy local” thrust of most do-it-yourself local currencies. Such schemes usually revolve around the retail offering of notes at a discount, meaning that consumers get, say, a 100 note for 90, but have to spend it at participating businesses, which in the end finance the 10% gap. By comparison, the kékfrank actually costs more than the forint, as it is issued in decorative boxes costing Ft 1,200.
As for what’s wrong with the kékfrank initiative, it’s hard to know where to start. For one thing, the idea that somehow this might offer savings on administrative costs is just loopy; if the kékfrank really has value, it will have to be treated just like any other currency. And no one could possibly claim that encouraging businesses in Sopron to also accept Estonian kroons or Eritrean nakfas would cut down on paperwork. As for whether it would help businesses dodge taxes by booking revenues as kékfranks rather than forints or euros, that’s just too silly to even contemplate.
But these are just minor details compared to the question of whether these people really think the kékfrank could somehow provide local businesses with an infusion of liquidity, or new business. In short, it can’t. If the notes really are going to maintain a one-to-one value with the forint, every kékfrank put into circulation must essentially be “backed” by a forint removed from circulation. Absent such a “currency board” setup, a group of companies all hard up for cash or credit might as well just issue invoices without due dates to each other, which essentially seems to be one of the main problems the kékfrank is meant to solve. Either that, or the kékfrank starts life with the same value as the forint, but then ends up as just a pretty piece of paper, like the old forints and pengős I have framed on my wall.
On the bright side, even though a scheme like this could easily turn out to be an out-and-out scam, it doesn’t appear the kékfrank is. Unfortunately, the notion that people really think it could work isn’t that much less scary.

Another argument against it is simply that ready cash usage is decreasing, whilst also this would threaten to reverse the trend in the decrease of counterfeit money in circulation – as reported yestarday on Portfolio.hu “Csökken a készpénzhasználat és hamisítás Magyarországon” http://www.portfolio.hu/cikkek.tdp?k=3&i=131800&hl=1
Actually it isn’t such a bad idea. Currency is only of value if people believe in it…why do you think the ratings agencies have such an affect on currencies – with their analysis? Why should events in Greece affect the Forint? Because people believe they are linked. Sea shells used to be a form of currency – so why not some nice looking paper.
The business advantage with this is, they can book those items they sell in Forints and pay the taxman, while the items, or percent of item, they sell with Kekfrank don’t need to be taxed. At the end of the day if people in Sopron believe in the viability of the Kekfrank then it will work – but I wouldn’t think that saying it is on par with the Forint is such a good idea. Maybe the Kekfrank has a better chance of appreciating this year than the Forint.
@Forintman: The scheme is nonsense for all the reasons previously mentioned, plus the pain of trading in a currency that is non-bankable, with no clear exchange rate mechanism etc… Most of all, this adds the pain of bookkeeping for the new currency. I know firms who plan to change their currency of their tax returns and reports, this takes them a good 12 months to plan, even when these firms already deal in the currency as their primary means of exchange.
No, this is just a useless scheme to try to avoid tax. But as pointed out, this will be just as heavily taxed. You cannot, in any modern economy, expect to produce value or work in kind without this also being taxed in some way. It may also be, that within Hungarian law such a competitor to the legal tender is automatically excluded and could result in action if it ever did look like siphoning off any business activity meant for the Forint.
The potential confidence in alternate currencies/tenders/means_of_exchange explains or justifies nothing. Also, with legal tender the measure of confidence is based on available data and assessments of economic activity (as well as political stability). This type of information, though imperfect, is available. We would be back as square one with an alternate currency, having to work out the value of the goods, services, quality etc… of the businesses involved. There are no short cuts. This *is* nonsense.
@Forintman: Yes, if there is some way it can provide
a tax fiddle it could be useful, but I don’t really
see how this is possible, at least not in the longer
term. Meanwhile, I think you are actually being
unfair to the National Bank and Hungary in general
in comparing the kékfrank favorably to the forint…
even I’m not that cynical. The one other thing I’d
say is that there very much is a rationale for
having something that promotes local goods and
services via a coupon/gift certificate system that
looks superficially like this. But again, this seems
to be about something different, namely credit
creation, which is either silly or dangerous,
depending on how generous one is feeling.
kékfrank. More like crankfrank. What about greenshield stamps. Have they gone forever?
The forint is a mickey mouse currency but is also the goose that lays the golden egg for a lot of predatory speculators and is therefore “protected”
in a strange kind of way by those that attack it. Killing the forint stone dead would be a walk in the park. But for those that can make a lot of money (and do) it would be inadvisable to kill that goose that lays the golden egg.
No “t”; the word for funny money is “scrip”. Fact-check, fact-
check, fact-check!
I consider this whole thing extraordinary.
There is abundant historical precedent for it in European history. During Weimar Germany, a number of local issued currencies competed with the national “Reichmark”. Issuing a local currency in competition with the national has happened in times of poor central govt management; it is associated with chaos and weak govt. Indeed, it would be a weak and disorganised central govt that would tolerate such a thing in the first place.
My God, this is legal to do in Hungary? God bless Sopron, but what if a dozen or more other communities decided to copy this idea? In the US, prior to 1861, the federal govt did not issue banknotes (just coin). They allowed privately owned banks to print their own paper money. The upshot of that was that those local notes were not honored throughout the country, only locally. You can’t stimulate the economy nationally with purely local money.
Also, what if Sopron “turns on the printing presses”, meaning it prints too much money and causes a local inflation? Then the blue money would lose parity with the forint. If there is not enough blue to meet the demand, then the notes will trade at a premium to the forint, inviting “Gresham’s Law”(Good money drives out the bad.)
Such arrangements undermine the role of a central bank, whose job it is to regulate the currency supply, and avoid inflation.
If the Hungarian govt allows this, then they have really lost the plot.
Who or what is the Hungarian government? We are about to exchange one set of idiots with another.
Paper money = I agree to pay the bearer the sum on demand.Buy real estate is my advice. Get value for your hard-earned. A Pledge to pay the bearer the sum on demand is wearing a bit thin!
Banks worldwide, financial institutions, the IMF, the EU, are all teetering on the brink of collapse.
Greece has massive debt along with Italy, Portugal,and Ireland. Iceland is bankrupt.
No amount of creative accounting will hide the fact that the Greeks will never, ever, be able to pay back what they owe. Lending money to bad debtors is folly.
Goldman Sachs are going to be investigated for the role they played (misleading investors)in the current economic debacle.
@László: Unless I am mistaken, the municipal
authorities in Sopron are NOT involved in this, or
at least are (certainly) not issuing the “currency”
themselves. So it’s not really comparable to the
examples in Wiemar Germany you mention. Still, it is
a challenge of sorts to the central government…
- Why would it be illegal in Hungary?
If I trade you two beans for a computer… is that illegal?
This just means no tax needed…
Face it, money is nothing… at all – just paper with ink.
The value is what people put into it.
- In England they have tried this in a city as well…
I say go for it… why not?
Use forints, fine… use seashells? Whose to stop you? How would
you collect tax on a trade in seashells anyway.
The system is a joke [world wide] you give your power to
whoever you wish.
@Mike: I have to assume you are being facetious. At
some point the parallel currency – whether it’s
kekfrank, seashells or whatever – will be converted
to real currency, and then booked as a sale/income,
at which point it would be a taxable transaction. Of
course, lots and lots of transactions in Hungary are
done as barter without any cash changing hands,
though this isn’t legal – barter is supposed to be
booked (and taxed) as if it was cash.
How many duck eggs, carrots, apples, and plums, do I owe the taxman?