Hungarian national airline Malév collapses into insolvency, ceases all flights (updated)
September 9th, 2010

If VAT cuts are good for the goose, aren’t they good for the gander?

tax-chicken.pngHungary’s Poultry Product Council (BTT) is making a push to reduce the VAT rate on poultry products in order to clamp down on what is said to be a large black market in baromfi. According to BTT President László Bárány, an estimated 15% of domestic poultry sales are done under the table, leading to the loss of an annual Ft 11 billion-Ft 12 billion in unpaid VAT, and putting legitimate poultry producers at a disadvantage. Bárány – whose name, by the way, means “sheep” – says that the current 25% VAT on basic poultry products should be gradually reduced to 8-12% within two or three years to whiten up the industry. What’s interesting about this is that the BTT seems to think there’s something special about the challenges facing the poultry industry, whereas in reality pretty much every sector in Hungary faces the same issue with the country’s sky-high VAT rate.

That said, if the BTT is successful in making its case, it could get the ball rolling for a general cut in the basic VAT rate, and all the distortion and growth-causing damage it cases. Unfortunately, given the state of Hungary’s public finances, it’s hard to imagine the government cutting the rate much, even though this would eventually lead to faster growth and a higher rate of VAT compliance (and possibly even more VAT receipts). You might even say it’s a classic “chicken and egg problem.” [piacesprofit.hu]

Topics
Share
Comments [6]
The All Hungary Media Group is firmly committed to freedom of expression and therefore applies a mostly "hands off" approach to comment moderation. Comments left by readers represent their own views and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or beliefs of the staff, editors or owner of the All Hungary Media Group, who nonetheless reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic or which moderators consider to constitute "hate speech." Also note that in order to prevent spam we generally close entries off to comments several days after publication.
Note that we will be experimenting with some modifications to the commenting system over the coming days, with the aim of allowing users to post without a CAPTCHA system and other manual anti-spam gizmos. We will therefore be monitoring comments more closely, and if you have any related issues or observations, you can just leave them in a comment on any article.
  1. DRUM says:

    I think 25% AFA on food is disgusting , they need to raise prices of Tobacco and alcohol and reduce all families food budget!!!!!!!!!! Every one needs to eat.

  2. C'est Moi says:

    Its great that you can find an unpopular group to pay for you to eat. Why not more gas tax for people drive cars it’s bad for the environment, or a tanning tax, or on porn, or gambling, or even a blogger tax. See this is the problem, rather than reduce the burden for everyone by slashing stupid spending, you think its entirely acceptable and just to go after someone who’s behavior you find disagreeable. At least you are correct about 25% VAT on food being discusting

  3. Elsbeth says:

    I was at a Vasedeny last week and priced a Kitchen Aid (high-end
    US electric mixer). It was 2 times the price it is in the US! Is that
    the VAT? or other levies on foreign goods.?

  4. C'est moi says:

    Yes, and learn to enjoy it. Those windbags in congress are wanting the same thing in the US.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Actually a VAT tax is more desirable than an income tax increase. Income taxes affects incentives to work and pay taxes. A consumption tax does not.

  6. Chris Wright says:

    C’est moi – Drum is not going after anyone when he
    makes the very reasonable suggestion that raising
    revenue (and there can be no argument that whatever
    cost cutting is done, Hungary must continue to raise
    revenue) ought not to be on necessities, when
    luxuries such as alcohol and tobacco are cheap
    compared to neighbouring countries. In my province
    withing Canada, liquor is sold at a very high price,
    and only through a government monopoly. While this
    is unpopular in some quarters it does pay for a
    balanced budget even while providing some pretty
    great social services, including first rate health
    care.